Nice does not equal weak
The 2019 Slovak presidential elections were held on 16 March 2019, with the runoff on 30 March 2019.
Winner of the first round was Zuzana Čaputová with 40.6% of the votes. Maroš Šefčovič received 18.7% of the votes. Based on these results, both Čaputová and Šefčovič earned a place in the runoff. During the second round Zuzana Čaputová received 58.4% of all votes and became the first female president of the Slovak Republic. Her inauguration will take place on 15 June 2019.
Let’s take a look at what preceded the victory of Zuzana Čaputová and the defeat of the Vice-President of the European Commission for the Energy Union Maroš Šefčovič.
A Way to Make a Change
Čaputová was a candidate of the political party called Progressive Slovakia. With just 4% in the first poles (in November), she was anything but an obvious leading figure of the elections. This however, radically changed after the resignation of Robert Mistrík, who gave up his place in favour of Čaputová. In February 2019 she gathered 44.8% of the votes. But it was not only this resignation that made Zuzana Čaputová important and in fact, the best candidate.
Right from the beginning of her campaign, her rhetoric was somewhat unusual. She was able to express her opinions in a very clear and cultivated manner in all discussions, without seeming weak. Even when she was criticised and unfairly accused of being too liberal for most Slovak people, supporting same-sex civil marriages and adoption of children by homosexual couples, she remained calm. Čaputová was seen as a liberal candidate who is not capable to impress more conservative voters, but her rhetoric did address voters whose values might have been slightly different and whose opinions are not very west-oriented.
The biggest problem that some candidates had with Čaputová was a lack of so called Christian values. Šefčovič spoke for a traditional family and traditional marriage. But what is more Christian? To accept everyone be it an immigrant or homosexual, or to solely accept people who are traditional themselves? I highly doubt that excluding people or questioning their rights would be the best representation of Christian values.
The Conservative Candidate and his Christian Values
Maroš Ševčovič was running as an independent candidate, supported by the Smer-SD party. He would not have made an incompetent President at all. Many people were positively surprised that the Smer-SD party had him as a candidate. Unfortunately, he adjusted his campaign to the rhetoric of the Smer party. He tried to impress conservative people by speaking against LGBT rights, same-sex adoptions and civil marriages. His critique of the opinions of his opponent, Čaputová, were quite expected. Šefčovič considered her liberalism to be against Christian values and traditions. As former Prime Minister Robert Fico (Smer-SD), Šefčovič also mentioned in some of the discussions that he was confirmed. Even though this might impress some people, for the majority, he was not believable enough. He could not even name all the Ten Commandments, when asked. He used the fear of the unknown and spoke of speedy deportation policies, while criticising Čaputová for her opinions of the European migrant crisis.
At the beginning of the campaigns, Šefčovič was a leading figure and that was not surprising at all, since he is a member of European Commission, a Slovak diplomat and Vice-President of the European Commission for the Energy Union. Zuzana Čaputová was almost unknown to most of the public but she managed to win the support of the majority of Slovak people, even those who have more conservative views. Her victory might be seen as a victory of decency and respectability and in fact, it may be even perceived as a victory of the values that Šefčovič based his campaign on.
A good President should connect people, not divide them. Speaking of values, connecting and collaboration are also the primary values that we should work on. Čaputová showed respect to all of her opponents, she took into consideration minorities in Slovakia and she showed everyone that actually being decent rather than aggressive is the way to win and make a difference.
Dieser Artikel präsentiert bewusst nur eine der zahlreichen, divergierenden Meinungen zu diesem kontroversen Thema. Sein Inhalt entspricht nicht zwingendermaßen der persönlichen Meinung seines Verfassers. Bitte sehen Sie hierzu Die Philosophie von Duel Amical.
Accept the challenge!
The counter-article on this topic is yet to be written. Accept the challenge and be the first one to share Your opinion! One of our authors has already presented their take on the issue. Should you be of a different opinion, please write your counter article in a similar form and send it to us to firstname.lastname@example.org.